"I realize that Granite Staters are proud of our libertarian tradition, and to many, making the use of seat belts mandatory seems at odds with this tradition. On a personal level, I don't like the idea that we need a law to tell people to exercise common sense. So, I used to think that mandating the use of seat belts wasn't necessary. I have since learned though that today's cars are designed to be better controlled by those using seat belts, and I have also become aware of how expensive it is to treat the severe injuries that occur when people don't use seat belts; few insurance policies cover the cost of head injuries in full, for example, so the rest of us end up paying for the care of people who don't use seat belts and get in an accident. So, both because drivers who don't use their belts aren't as able to control their cars during a skid or accident, and because the rest of us end up shouldering the cost of caring for the severely injured whose injuries would have been avoided by using seat belt, I think a law makes sense. I am also the mother of a son with a brain injury, and have seen the impact of severe injuries on my own families and others -- I think a mandatory law could really help families and individuals avoid great pain and difficulty and that, on balance, avoiding serious injury is worth the modest limitation of being required to wear a seat belt."
Source: Citizens Count Issue Survey 2010