Establishes protections for property owners if a pipeline company takes their land through eminent domain. For example, this bill sets up a process for the pipeline company to pay for reloaction, temporary housing, and legal expenses.
Eminent Domain Restrictions
Generally, eminent domain law allows the state to take private property for public use as long as fair compensation is offered. Eminent domain is used by the government to take private land for the greater public good, usually for road and highway projects.
For instance, the massive $269 million Little Bay Bridges project in the Seacoast region involved land takings in order to widen the Spaulding Turnpike through areas of Newington and Dover.
Eminent domain in NH
A 2006 New Hampshire constitutional amendment forbids the government from using eminent domain for private development.
Eminent domain re-entered the spotlight in 2012 with the Northern Pass Project. Spokespeople for the project said that there was no plan to use eminent domain, but some residents felt their land was at risk.
The state Legislature ultimately passed HB 648, which forbids the use of eminent domain for regional electricity projects when costs and benefits cannot be shared across the ISO - New England network. ISO - New England is responsible for moving electricity throughout New England, including New Hampshire.
Some argue that HB 648 should be expanded to forbid eminent domain for all projects that do not directly benefit New Hampshire. Some HB 648 opponents are also concerned that the bill is too reliant on a non-governmental entity, ISO - New England.
Others support the narrow language of HB 648 because projects that do not benefit New Hampshire directly may still benefit the state by boosting the regional economy.
Makes various changes to the laws regarding the use of eminent domain for pipelines. For example, this bill allows an owner whose property is taken under eminent domain to require the pipeline company to acquire the entire property, not just a part.
Requires offers in eminent domain cases to be at least 300% of the determined fair market value of the property. If it is determined that a property was undervalued by 20%, this bill also states the condemning authority would be liable to the property owner for attorney's fees.
Allows the condemnee to refuse an offer from the condemnor under eminent domain law.
Requires approval of "the appropriate legislative body" before publicly owned landed is seized through eminent domain.
Requires public utilities to notify the governor and all state legislators of a proposed project, then wait until a full legislative session has passed before acquiring land by eminent domain. This would give the legislature the opportunity to ban the use of eminent domain for a particular project.
Originally written to require a pipeline company to purchase all of a resident's land when the land is taken through eminent domain. The Senate rewrote the bill to instead increase the criteria for the Site Evaluation Committee to consider when approving pipelines.
Forbids the use of eminent domain for regional electricity projects when costs and benefits cannot be shared across the ISO - New England network.
Should NH do more to limit eminent domain?
The state is considering seizing up to six properties, using the power of eminent domain, in order to replace the bridge over Hampton Harbor. Eminent domain could be required for only one option the state is considering, a replacement on the east side of the current bridge - and then, only if residents and public officials could not come to an agreement outside of court. Rehabilitating the existing bridge or building a replacement to the west are also under consideration.
CONTACT ELECTED OFFICIALS »
Here in NH, your opinion counts. We make it easy to find and reach out to your elected officials about the issues that matter most to you. Click to search and contact your elected officials!