Ban on wildlife trafficking, ivory sales?

On March 8 the New Hampshire Senate will vote on a bill to ban ivory sales and other wildlife trafficking in New Hampshire.

There is already a federal ban on trafficking in ivory and other endangered animal parts. Federal law only covers imports and sales across state lines, however. The New Hampshire bill, SB 451, would cover any sales within the Granite State.

About SB 451

SB 451 prohibits the sale of animal parts from a list of protected species, such as elephants and tigers.

The bill excludes certain products, such as certified antiques and musical instruments. There is also an exception for knives and firearms, so long as the animal part is "fixed or integral" and the weapon was legally imported and/or purchased.

Simple possession of an animal product without the intent to sell would be legal.

The penalty in SB 451 is a violation with a fine worth up to two times the value of the product, or $1,000, whichever is greater.

Arguments for and against SB 451

Bill supporters argue that the illegal wildlife trade is a significant threat to biodiversity worldwide, and right now there is no law against sales within the state of New Hampshire.

Some conservationists argue that SB 451 could actually do more to prevent illegal wildlife trafficking. For example, SB 451 could add stricter penalties for repeat offenders. The exemption for antiques also provides illegal traffickers with a way to disguise sales.

On the other side of the issue, some knife rights advocates argue the exceptions for weapons in SB 451 are too narrowly written, and will unjustly limit the activity of knife collectors in the state.

Do you have an opinion on wildlife trafficking in New Hampshire? Share your opinion in the comments below.