Skip to main content

Coronavirus crisis may prompt tax changes

News Date

In 2020 New Hampshire candidates will be prompted to take “The Pledge” against an income or sales tax.  That pledge is one reason why New Hampshire has a lean budget compared to other states.  It’s also one reason why New Hampshire has less revenue to work with during a budget shortfall.   

As the coronavirus crisis drains state coffers, policymakers will have to get creative with the revenue available—and will almost certainly debate new revenue streams.  This article provides an overview of the current budget situation and possible targets for new taxes. 

New Hampshire’s revenue outlook 

After Gov. Sununu ordered non-essential businesses to close, revenue from business taxes and meals and rooms taxes plummeted.  Interest and dividends tax revenue is also down. 

At the end of April New Hampshire reported revenues about $75 million below the annual budget plan. 

The federal government granted New Hampshire $1.25 billion to spend on coronavirus-related relief, but so far strict rules prevent that money from covering a general decrease in tax revenue. 

New Hampshire’s next safety net is the Rainy Day Fund, which can partially cover the budget deficit.  At the start of the coronavirus crisis the Rainy Day Fund held over $115 million. 

There is no expiration date for the coronavirus, however, and economic hardship is likely to continue for many months.  Tax revenues aren’t done falling.  New Hampshire will need to patch a hole in the budget. 

Cutting spending may not cut it 

New Hampshire can start by cutting some spending.  For example, Gov. Sununu recently ordered a hiring freeze.   

The Granite State already has a relatively lean budget, however.  New Hampshire government has some of the lowest spending per capita among U.S. states.

New Hampshire’s next option is raising taxes, fees, and fines.  Here’s an overview of some of the big ticket options. 

Tobacco taxes 

New Hampshire has the lowest tobacco tax in New England by twenty cents, which typically lures shoppers across the border.  So far coronavirus hasn’t stopped those smokers.  Tobacco tax revenue was roughly $5 million above expectations in April.   

Strong sales and low tax rates make cigarettes an obvious target for a tax increase.  The Department of Revenue Administration estimates increasing the tax on a pack of cigarettes from $1.78 to $1.90 could generate more than $12 million a year in new revenue. 

The House already voted to increase the tax on e-cigarettes in March, through HB 1699.  That bill, like most 2020 bills, is on hold during the coronavirus crisis.  The legislature suspended activity but is planning to reconvene this summer. 

On the downside, a cigarette tax increase will primarily burden low income families—the very people struggling to survive during the coronavirus crisis.  Low income residents are far more likely to smoke than higher income residents, and they spend a larger share of their income on cigarette taxes.   

Business taxes 

Business tax revenue accounts for close to a third of all general and education funding in New Hampshire, so any business tax change can have a big impact on state revenues. 

Last year’s state budget compromise included a “trigger” for business tax rates to increase or decrease, depending on how much money the state pulls in. At this point it looks very likely that revenue will be low enough to trigger a tax rate increase at the end of the state fiscal year, June 30. 

Business are lobbying for a freeze on tax rates, however.  Jim Roche, President of the Business & Industry Association, wrote to legislators, “To enact [business] tax increases at this time ... would be extremely insensitive to the struggles of employers of all sizes and will adversely impact their ability to rehire employees at the very time rehiring is desperately needed.” 

Capital gains tax 

Last year the New Hampshire House debated adding a capital gains tax, as part of a new school funding plan. 

A capital gains tax is a tax on profits from the sale of certain types of assets, such as stocks or real estate (other than your primary residence).  Depending on how the tax is structured, it could bring in close to $100 million a year.   

Supporters argue that a capital gains tax would mostly impact wealthy residents who can afford higher taxes. 

Opponents argue that a capital gains tax punishes saving and investing—exactly when the economy needs investors. 

Marijuana legalization 

For years New Hampshire has debated legalizing and taxing recreational marijuana.  The state could generate revenue by taxing marijuana sales, but there are also significant costs related to regulation.  Recent bills to legalize marijuana estimated somewhere around $20 to $30 million in yearly state revenue. 

Supporters point out that New Hampshire is surrounded by states that have already legalized marijuana: Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont. 

Opponents argue that New Hampshire should not make it easier to use illicit substances when the state is still battling widespread substance misuse. 

Road usage fee 

As drivers switch to fuel-efficient vehicles, New Hampshire has seen a drop in gas tax revenue.  For several years legislators have considered supplementing the gas tax with a road usage fee.  Drivers would pay the fee annually based on their car’s miles per gallon or miles traveled. 

The Department of Safety hasn’t offered any estimates on the potential revenue from a road usage fee, and there could be a huge range depending on how the fee is structured.  Rough estimates guess somewhere in the tens of millions of dollars.  (Motor vehicle registration fees generated around $70 million in the last fiscal year.) 

Supporters argue a road usage fee ensures all drivers – especially hybrid and electric vehicle drivers – pay their fair share for road maintenance. 

Opponents argue that a road usage fee unfairly punishes people who are driving vehicles that benefit the environment. 

Other revenue ideas 

New Hampshire voters have shown little tolerance for any broad-based sales or income tax, but Granite Staters might consider a limited proposal, such as a sales tax on luxury goods. 

Budget writers could also raise fees on everything from vanity license plates to dam permits. 

Lastly, the state could revisit expanded gambling.  For example, the legislature recently rejected bills to allow historic horse racing terminals at charitable gaming locations.  Those bills estimated about $10 million in annual revenue for the state. 


Login or register to post comments


Add to the gas tax. It will hardly be noticable right now. Estate tax over a million. Lodging taxes, especially on short term rentals would not hurt residents. Sales tax on some luxury goods and guns.


Add to the gas tax. It will hardly be noticable right now. Estate tax over a million. Lodging taxes, especially on short term rentals would not hurt residents. Sales tax on some luxury goods and guns.


EVERYONE NEEDS MORE MONEY. How about a huge raise for almost everyone, especially the "not so rich"? The argument needs to be about reducing taxes & the Cost of Living, not more State Revenue; not more taxes & State spending. NH people can show the World, make NH The Greatest State in the Union.
Asking politicians to pledge not to support a Sales or Income Tax is just DUMB ! It detracts from dealing with the big tax & spend issues. Two of those issues are the 300% taxation on electricity & approx 65 % taxation on Consumer Goods & Services; hidden taxes that if eliminated, would result in what would be equivalent to a huge increase in income. We need to force politicians to address these issues.
Some Republicans say that "NH doesn't have any taxes because we have no Sales or Income Tax". Democrats tell me that we can have more spending because they will "make companies pay" (Business Profits Taxes). A long time Legislator on the Budget Committee tells me that he has never been able to discuss line items on the State Budget- they are all too afraid that someone won't get taxpayer money that they asked for. More State Revenue & Spending makes people more poor because, as history shows, people's income never keeps up with more government spending.
Even in NH, government spending can be greatly reduced which amounts to huge raises for almost everyone. One big parasitic load on the taxpayers is the Dept. of Economic Development. Not only does the Dept. have lots of employees, it spends millions to advertise. One big reason companies can't move to NH and pay higher wages is because of the high cost of electricity. And having DRED spending millions/year advertising is another dumb idea. By reducing the cost of electricity by about 2/3, companies will move to NH without DRED. Another big reason to eliminate DRED, is that bureaucrats don't do much of anything, if anything at all, to bring businesses to NH.

I asked DRED people to assist in getting Clean Energy plants manufactured at the Westinghouse plant in Newington; a huge income stream for many, because these power plants are in demand all over the world. Their response: "It's beyond our pay grade". My response: YOU'RE FIRED !

Other, "make people poor taxes", include hidden taxes on most everything people buy. I estimate it's about 65%. For example, each company pays approx. 12 taxes and there are at least 10 companies involved in getting a box of macaroni & cheese to your shopping cart. That amounts to 120 different taxes on a box of macaroni & cheese. It's no wonder there isn't much "food" in those boxes.

Voters just can't ask politicians what their goals are; they have to be told & only the voters can tell them !

Bill Fortune, Independent for NH Governor 603 365 0251

Thank you to our sponsors and donors