Mike Bordes
Serving as: NH House Belknap County District 05
These objective, nonpartisan measures are used to show this legislator's activities at the Statehouse in 2025. The measures are not intended to present a ranking or rating of any kind. Average is that of all state elected officials in this chamber. Gov. Ayotte is still in the process of signing and vetoing 2025 bills, so the number of prime sponsored bills that became law may increase.
Session days attended
Party unity score/partisanship
Participated in official roll call votes
Bills sponsored (as prime sponsor)
Prime sponsored bills that became law
Voting Record
HB 1 (2025)
State budget bill. The governor presented her proposal for the next state budget February 13. Click here to read a summary of the budget process.
HB 10 (2025)
Establishes a Parental Bill of Rights. The bill requires schools to adopt a policy to promote parental involvement in the public school system. The bill also establishes a right to sue schools that violate the law.
The final version of this bill requires schools to respond to parental inquiries "regarding any and all matters related to their minor child," within ten days.
The final Senate version of this bill also does not require parents to give written consent to any medical procedure or treatment; that provision was removed after much debate.
HB 148 (2025)
Adds an exception to state anti-discrimination laws for bathrooms, locker rooms, sports, prisons, hospitals, and treatment centers to classify individuals based on biological sex.
HB 198 (2025)
Removes the legal penalties for possessing and using marijuana and cannabis-infused products for those over age twenty-one. This bill does not include any mechanism for legal sales or taxation.
HB 238 (2025)
Right-to-work bill that prohibits collective bargaining agreements that require employees to join or contribute to a labor union.
HB 282 (2025)
Increases the maximum compensation for first responders' critical injury benefits from $500,000 to $1,000,000.
HB 324 (2025)
Prohibits K-12 schools from making "any material that is harmful to minors" available to students. The bill defines this material to include various content related to sex. This bill also requires school boards to adopt complaint resolution policies to address complaints regarding harmful material by parents or guardians.
HB 357 (2025)
Removes the authority of the Department of Health and Human Services to require vaccinations beyond those in state law. This bill specifically notes that the requirements for chickenpox, Hepatitis B, and Hib vaccinations will expire in 2026.
The House added the text of this bill to SB 60.
HB 377 (2025)
Makes it a felony to provide hormone treatments and puberty blockers to a minor unless a minor is "born with a medically verifiable disorder of sex development."
The Senate amended the bill to allow doctors to continue hormone treatments and puberty blockers started prior to January 1, 2026.
The Senate amended the bill to also recognize Children's Environmental Health Day, similar to SB 184.
A conference committee of representatives and senators agreed to those Senate amendments.
HB 53 (2025)
Allows qualifying medical marijuana patients and caregivers to grow marijuana at home. There would be limits on the size of the growing operation.
The House added the text of this bill to SB 118.
HB 56 (2025)
Requires sales and transfers of firearms to take place through licensed dealers. Those dealers are required to perform background checks. This bill also establishes a 3-day waiting period for firearm transfers. The bill includes some exceptions, such as transfers between immediate family members.
HB 60 (2025)
After six months of renting, this bill adds the expiration of the term of the lease or tenancy as grounds for an eviction.
The Senate amended the bill so that it will only take effect if there is a 4% vacancy rate in the state. The amended bill also increases in the minimum lease term to twelve months before eviction.
A conference committee of representatives and senators agreed on a final version of the bill. Landlords could evict without cause after twelve months, and the law would take effect regardless of the vacancy rate.
HB 649 (2025)
Removes the requirement for physical safety inspections and on-board diagnostic tests for passenger vehicles and eliminates funding for the Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Abatement Fund.
SB 14 (2025)
Sets a mandatory minimum sentence for supplying fentanyl. The minimum starts at three years and six months and goes up for higher quantities.
The House amended the bill to also increase penalties for dealing fentanyl to a person who overdoses and dies, similar to SB 15. The amendment also decreases the penalty for possessing 3/4 of an ounce or less of psilocybin (magic mushrooms) to a misdemeanor.
SB 228 (2025)
Modifies the scope and capacity limits of community solar projects. Generally speaking, this bill increases the size of projects that can participate in net energy metering. The bill also allows nonprofit educational institutions and public housing authorities to operate as “municipal hosts” for net metering.
The Senate added some of this bill to HB 710.
SB 284 (2025)
Limits zoning laws to require no more than one parking spaces per residential unit, with exceptions for certain workforce housing and multi-family developments.
The House amended the bill to remove those exceptions.
SB 287 (2025)
If an absentee voter asks for a ballot to be mailed to an address other than the address shown on the voter checklist, this bill adds additional verification requirements. In particular, the voter must show a copy of their photo ID to the clerk or include a notarized signature on their absentee ballot application. If an absentee voter does not complete either step, "his or her signature on the application for an absentee ballot shall be compared to his or her signature on the absentee ballot affidavit on election day in the same manner as other voters."
SB 295 (2025)
Removes the household income limit to participate in the Education Freedom Account (EFA) program.
The Senate amended the bill, adding a 10,000 enrollment cap for the EFA program. If there are 9,000 EFA applicants in a year, the enrollment cap would increase by 25%.
SB 62 (2025)
Prohibits state and local government from blocking law enforcement participation in a federal 287(g) program. That program allows local law enforcement to perform some immigration enforcement duties.
The House amended the bill to add the text of SB 71, which prohibits state and local governments from adopting "sanctuary policies," which prohibit or impede law enforcement cooperating with federal immigration enforcement.
Completed our 2024 State Candidate Survey
Position on Issues
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Do you support the “Education Freedom Account” program, which gives students access to the per-pupil share of state school funding to spend on private school or home school expenses?
"While I support the concept of allowing parents to have a say in their child's education, I also believe that there should be some level of accountability in place to ensure that students are receiving a proper education. This is especially important in the case of home-schooled children, as there is less oversight compared to traditional public schools. One way to ensure that home-schooled children are receiving a quality education is by implementing a yearly proctored exam. This exam would serve as a way to assess the student's academic progress and ensure that they are meeting the necessary educational standards. By requiring home-schooled students to take this exam, we can help guarantee that they are receiving a well-rounded education that prepares them for future success."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire ban abortions during the first trimester (e.g. after 6 weeks gestation)?
"The state does not impose restrictions or barriers to accessing abortion services prior to 24 weeks, allowing women to seek out the care they need without fear of judgement or interference from the government. It is important to note that there are exceptions for abortions after 24 weeks in cases where the life of the mother is at risk. In these situations, it is crucial that women have access to the care they need in order to protect their health and well-being. By allowing these exceptions, the state demonstrates a commitment to upholding the rights and safety of women in all circumstances."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire ban abortions during the second trimester (e.g. after 15 weeks gestation)?
"The state does not impose restrictions or barriers to accessing abortion services prior to 24 weeks, allowing women to seek out the care they need without fear of judgement or interference from the government. It is important to note that there are exceptions for abortions after 24 weeks in cases where the life of the mother is at risk. In these situations, it is crucial that women have access to the care they need in order to protect their health and well-being. By allowing these exceptions, the state demonstrates a commitment to upholding the rights and safety of women in all circumstances."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should NH add an income tax on earned income?
"New Hampshire's decision not to add an income tax on earned income has proven to be a wise choice that aligns with its values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. This unique tax policy has helped to attract individuals and businesses to the state, stimulate economic growth, and promote competitiveness in the region. As a result, New Hampshire continues to thrive as a destination of choice for those seeking financial freedom and opportunity."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should NH add a broad-based sales tax?
"Implementing a sales tax would fundamentally change the identity of New Hampshire as a low-tax state. The absence of a sales tax has been a key feature of the state's economic and political landscape for decades. Residents have come to appreciate the lack of a sales tax and the relative simplicity of the state's tax system. Introducing a sales tax would not only increase the burden on residents but also send a message that New Hampshire is willing to abandon its principles for short-term financial gain."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire lower business taxes?
"Lower business taxes would also benefit consumers in New Hampshire by driving down prices and increasing competition. When businesses are able to operate more efficiently due to lower taxes, they are able to offer lower prices to consumers. This would make goods and services more affordable for residents of New Hampshire, improving their quality of life and increasing their purchasing power."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire add a tax on capital gains?
"Adding a tax on capital gains in New Hampshire would be a shortsighted and detrimental decision. The tax would deter investment, hinder economic growth, and create unnecessary administrative burdens. Rather than implementing new taxes, the state should focus on maintaining its competitive tax advantage and fostering a business-friendly environment to attract investment and stimulate economic growth."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire government do more to address climate change?
"Undecided"
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Do you support giving voters who register without ID on Election Day a ballot that only counts if they return identifying documents to the state before a deadline?
"New Hampshire's commitment to safe and fair elections is a testament to the values of our state. By protecting the integrity of the voting process, making voting accessible to all citizens, and ensuring that everyone has the right to vote, New Hampshire upholds the principles of democracy and ensures that every voice is heard."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should the state do more to encourage municipalities to remove zoning barriers to housing development?
"New Hampshire, as with many states across the country, is facing a housing crisis. The demand for housing in the state far outweighs the supply, leading to skyrocketing home prices and rents that are out of reach for many residents. One way to address this crisis is by encouraging municipalities to remove zoning barriers to housing development. Zoning regulations that restrict the types of housing that can be built in certain areas, such as single-family homes only in residential neighborhoods, can severely limit the amount of housing that is available. These regulations often result in a lack of affordable housing options, as well as a lack of housing diversity to meet the needs of different demographics. By removing these barriers and allowing for increased housing development, municipalities can help alleviate the housing shortage in New Hampshire. This can be achieved by implementing policies that allow for higher density housing, mixed-use developments, and other forms of housing that are currently prohibited by zoning regulations."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Do you support legislation to expand the net energy metering system capacity cap from 1 MW to 5 MW for all residential and commercial customers in New Hampshire?
"Undecided"
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire guarantee the right to access abortion before 24 weeks?
"The state does not impose restrictions or barriers to accessing abortion services prior to 24 weeks, allowing women to seek out the care they need without fear of judgement or interference from the government. It is important to note that there are exceptions for abortions after 24 weeks in cases where the life of the mother is at risk. In these situations, it is crucial that women have access to the care they need in order to protect their health and well-being. By allowing these exceptions, the state demonstrates a commitment to upholding the rights and safety of women in all circumstances."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should the state increase funding for child care providers?
"Undecided"
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Do you support New Hampshire’s current system of public school funding, with about two-thirds of total funding coming from local property taxes?
"Undecided"
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire legalize the recreational use of marijuana by allowing home-growing and private use without sales?
"One of the major issues that arises from legalizing marijuana is the fact that it is still classified as a schedule 1 drug at the federal level. This means that anyone who uses marijuana, even in states where it is legal, is technically in violation of federal law. This becomes a major concern for gun owners in New Hampshire, as federal law prohibits anyone who is an 'unlawful user' of any controlled substance from possessing firearms. If New Hampshire were to legalize marijuana for recreational use, many gun owners who currently possess firearms legally could suddenly find themselves in violation of federal law and at risk of becoming felons overnight. This is a serious issue that cannot be ignored, as it could have devastating consequences for law-abiding citizens who simply enjoy using marijuana recreationally."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire legalize the recreational use of marijuana by licensing growers and private retail locations?
"One of the major issues that arises from legalizing marijuana is the fact that it is still classified as a schedule 1 drug at the federal level. This means that anyone who uses marijuana, even in states where it is legal, is technically in violation of federal law. This becomes a major concern for gun owners in New Hampshire, as federal law prohibits anyone who is an 'unlawful user' of any controlled substance from possessing firearms. If New Hampshire were to legalize marijuana for recreational use, many gun owners who currently possess firearms legally could suddenly find themselves in violation of federal law and at risk of becoming felons overnight. This is a serious issue that cannot be ignored, as it could have devastating consequences for law-abiding citizens who simply enjoy using marijuana recreationally."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire legalize the recreational use of marijuana by establishing state-run cannabis stores?
"One of the major issues that arises from legalizing marijuana is the fact that it is still classified as a schedule 1 drug at the federal level. This means that anyone who uses marijuana, even in states where it is legal, is technically in violation of federal law. This becomes a major concern for gun owners in New Hampshire, as federal law prohibits anyone who is an 'unlawful user' of any controlled substance from possessing firearms. If New Hampshire were to legalize marijuana for recreational use, many gun owners who currently possess firearms legally could suddenly find themselves in violation of federal law and at risk of becoming felons overnight. This is a serious issue that cannot be ignored, as it could have devastating consequences for law-abiding citizens who simply enjoy using marijuana recreationally."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire raise the minimum wage?
"Raising the minimum wage could also have unintended consequences for workers in New Hampshire. While the intention behind raising the minimum wage is to help low-wage workers earn a higher income, it could actually result in reduced job opportunities for these workers. Employers may be forced to cut back on hiring or reduce the number of hours worked by their employees in order to offset the increased labor costs, leaving some workers worse off than before."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire add legal protections for residents of other states who travel here for health care related to abortion or gender transition?
"While it is important to recognize and respect the healthcare decisions of all individuals, it is also important for New Hampshire to prioritize the needs of its own residents. Adding legal protections specifically for non-residents who come to the state for abortion or gender transition services could potentially compromise individual rights, strain healthcare resources, and lead to unintended consequences. It is important for New Hampshire to carefully consider the implications of adding legal protections for residents of other states before making any decisions on this matter."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should New Hampshire repeal the ban on abortion after 24 weeks gestation?
"The state does not impose restrictions or barriers to accessing abortion services prior to 24 weeks, allowing women to seek out the care they need without fear of judgement or interference from the government. It is important to note that there are exceptions for abortions after 24 weeks in cases where the life of the mother is at risk. In these situations, it is crucial that women have access to the care they need in order to protect their health and well-being. By allowing these exceptions, the state demonstrates a commitment to upholding the rights and safety of women in all circumstances."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should NH require local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement?
"New Hampshire should require local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement in order to ensure the safety and security of all residents in the state. Cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement is crucial for maintaining law and order within our communities. When local police agencies refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials, they are effectively creating safe havens for individuals who have violated immigration laws. This not only undermines the rule of law but also hinders efforts to protect our communities from individuals who may pose a threat to public safety."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2024
Should NH pass stricter gun control laws?
"The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. This fundamental right is essential to the protection of our freedom and liberty. Passing stricter gun control laws in New Hampshire would only serve to infringe upon the rights of law-abiding citizens and make it more difficult for them to protect themselves and their families. New Hampshire should never pass stricter gun control laws. These laws would only serve to infringe upon the rights of law-abiding citizens, while doing little to reduce gun violence. It is essential to protect the Second Amendment rights of individuals and ensure that they have the ability to defend themselves and their families. Passing stricter gun control laws is not the answer to reducing gun violence, and we must instead focus on addressing the root causes of violence in our society."
