There’s been a lot of talk about gambling in New Hampshire in recent years, from sports betting to Keno and proposed casinos. Recently, historic horse racing has gained traction, and this year there are several proposals to legalize this form of gambling.
What is historic horse racing?
When you hear the term “historic horse racing,” you may imagine some sort of historical quaint reenactment involving horses at an old fashioned race track. In reality, historic horse racing is a form of gaming done at an electronic terminal similar to a slot machine.
First, the gamer deposits his or her wager into the machine. The computer then randomly selects a race from a video library of historic races, without telling the user where or when that race originally took place. The user does get to see information about the jockeys’ and trainers’ winning percentages, however. There’s also an option for the computer to automatically make a selection on the user’s behalf. Then, a video of that historic race plays and the bettor finds out if their horse won. There are benefits to doing it this way: for one, you don’t have to go to an actual horse racing track in order to play the game. Also, you don’t have to wait for a real horse race to begin and end to find out if you won.
Winnings are decided based on a traditional pari-mutuel process. In a pari-mutuel game, the user’s initial wager is divided between several different betting pools. For example, there might be a pool of money for users who correctly pick the winner of the race, for picking the correct order of the top three finishers, and so on. If the user wins any of these, they get the winnings from those pools. If not, the money keeps building up in those pools until a gamer wins a payout.
What’s in the bills?
The bills begin by adding “historic” horse racing into the existing regulations related to other types of live or electronic wagering. Those wishing to maintain historic horse racing terminals would need to already be a licensed game operator (there are currently 16 licensed operators in the state). Gaming terminals would only be allowed to feature pari-mutuel games. Terminals would need to have been tested by an independent testing lab approved by the gaming commission to ensure the games are fair. Wagers would be limited to a maximum of $25.
A portion of proceeds from these wagers would help fund services for those with struggling with problem gaming. Another portion would be set aside for charitable organizations, with preference given to local charities. An even larger portion would go to state education funding. This is similar to the breakdown of revenue for other forms of gambling in the Granite State.
Benefits for the community
Some proponents argue that these bills would have a positive impact on the community because they would provide more money for the state’s charitable organizations. In fact, during the hearing for SB 112, representatives from numerous charities across the state testified about the positive impact this bill would have on their ability to raise revenue. The games would also bring in more money for local operators and for the state’s problem gaming initiatives, not to mention statewide school funding.
It is worth noting that, while Citizens Count does not take a position on issues, we are one of the many 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations that currently benefit from charitable gaming.
Opponents argue that these sorts of games are particularly addicting. While “historic horse racing” may conjure up images of majestic animals racing at the Kentucky Derby, in reality historic horse racing terminals are very similar to slot machines. The COVID-19 pandemic has also led many to experience social isolation, job loss, and stress, all of which are risk factors for compulsive gambling. Last year, The National Council on Problem Gambling received 443 calls to its 24-hour helpline from New Hampshire, an increase of 24% compared to the year before.
This year’s bills also have a higher bet limit ($25 versus $10) than bills from previous years.
Lastly, opponents also argue these bills are a cheap deal for charities; the primary beneficiaries are the state and the game operators. There are plenty of ways to support New Hampshire’s charitable organizations without expanding gambling in the state.
You can voice your opinion on these bills by reaching out to your representatives and senators and telling them your thoughts. To get started, find out who represents you on our website.