Eric Turer
Historical Details
Position on Issues
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Do you support the “Education Freedom Account” program, which gives students access to the per-pupil share of state school funding to spend on private school or home school expenses?
"NO - This is a terrible policy that undermines public education and the unity of the community to continually improve our school system. It diverts public funds to private and religious schools with little oversight. Most of the recipients were already in private school settings. Vouchers lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure in public education systems, as those with the means use public resources as a supplement to support their private decision and leave the schools with the fixed costs. This change was inserted into the budget rather than being passed by legislators to hide the underlying intentions and has opened the state system up unlimited costs that have already greatly exceeded the programs' budget."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should New Hampshire ban abortion after 20 weeks gestation, with exceptions for cases of rape/incest and health complications?
"These decisions are very personal and difficult. They should be made by the woman, not the state. I am firmly Pro Choice, from both a practical and philosophical perspective. First, a woman should have the right to make decisions about her health and reproduction. Unintended pregnancies, unknown health risks, and even rape/incest are things that do happen. We can't ban abortion - only safe and medically appropriate ones. Our society is also strengthened by family planning and parents that are ready and able to care for their children to the degree they feel is appropriate. There is also seemingly little appetite for providing greater resources to support more children born to families that cannot support them (separate discussion). Nobody is forced to have an abortion - it is a choice and often a difficult one, as it should be. More could be said here, but I should also add that my wife is an Ob/Gyn and she sees the many permutations of these difficult decisions play out in real, not theoretical, terms. Abortion should be rare, safe, and legal."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire ban abortion after 24 weeks gestation, with exceptions for cases of rape/incest and health complications?
"No. These decisions are very personal and difficult. They should be made by the woman, not the state. I am firmly Pro Choice, from both a practical and philosophical perspective. First, a woman should have the right to make decisions about her health and reproduction. Unintended pregnancies, unknown health risks, and even rape/incest are things that do happen. We can't ban abortion - only safe and medically appropriate ones. Our society is also strengthened by family planning and parents that are ready and able to care for their children to the degree they feel is appropriate. There is also seemingly little appetite for providing greater resources to support more children born to families that cannot support them (separate discussion). Nobody is forced to have an abortion - it is a choice and often a difficult one, as it should be. More could be said here, but I will also add that my wife is an Ob/Gyn and she sees the many permutations of these difficult decisions play out in real, not theoretical, terms. Abortion should be rare, safe, and legal. This is particularly true for those in the later term."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should NH pursue expanded commuter rail?
"Continued widening of our highways is a massively wasteful way to improve our connectivity to Boston and other major hubs. Rail is far more efficient - both in terms of energy and people's time. The opposition is limiting employment opportunities, increasing pollution, and holding our state back."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should NH limit terms for elected officials?
"YES, but....: We are a citizen led society, so leadership should not be a permanent job. Term limits can have an important role in keeping leaders connected and accountable. I do, however, favor relatively long term limits as it takes time to 'learn' the job and much time is spent on re-election, so there is value in continuity as long as the voters still support the official."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should NH increase funding for heroin treatment programs?
"Treatment of addiction is in the interest of everyone and resources are badly lacking in our state. Ultimately, however, we must target the underlying causes of addiction and the market driven incentives, both legal and illegal, that promote initiation and addiction."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire ban abortions during the first trimester (e.g. after 6 weeks gestation)?
"Repeal 24 week ban: YES - Any decisions that a woman and her family makes in this area are very personal and difficult. They should be made by the woman her health care providers, and those she wishes to involve...... not by the state. Nothing is gained by state intervention in these private family matters. I am firmly Pro Choice, from both a practical and philosophical perspective. With the recent Supreme Court decision, taking away a woman's/family's right to make private medical decisions and leaving it to state legislatures to intervene, it has never been more important to have representative in Concord that will honor the rights of privacy and personal choice that women have held for decades. The Supreme Court took away the most fundamental right of women and families to make private choices, gave it to ever-changing state legislatures. If I'm elected I will work to give that right back. I will not only work to repeal this legislation, I'll work to codify a woman's choice as a right in NH, as it has been for the past 50 years. With respect to the 24 week threshold - this is a ban on something that is literally not done in our state. This law only exists to open the door to further restrictions by allowing the legislature to lower the threshold in increments - which has already been attempted. More could be said here, but I will also add that this is more than an abstract argument to me. My wife is an Ob/Gyn physician who has cared for women in our community for decades, and she has seen the many permutations of these difficult decisions play out in real, not theoretical, terms. Guarantee Right to abortion before 24 weeks: YES - This should be reinstated as a RIGHT, under individual privacy, as it has been for the past 50 years. First and foremost, a woman should have the right to make decisions about her health and reproduction. Unintended pregnancies, forced pregnancies, and unknown health risks are things that do happen. We can't ban abortions - only safe and medically appropriate ones. Our society is also strengthened by family planning and parents that are ready and able to care for their children to the degree they feel is appropriate. There is also seemingly little appetite for providing greater resources to support more children born to families that cannot support them (separate discussion). Nobody is forced to have an abortion - it is a choice and often a difficult one, as it should be. Any fully elective abortions near or at viability would normally be reviewed by medical ethics boards which would explore questions of the clinical and psycho-social situation surrounding a situation. Abortion should be rare, safe, and legal. Privacy and choice over one's body and family should be sacrosanct freedoms, not to be infringed by the state."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire ban abortions during the second trimester (e.g. after 15 weeks gestation)?
"Repeal 24 week ban: YES - Any decisions that a woman and her family makes in this area are very personal and difficult. They should be made by the woman her health care providers, and those she wishes to involve...... not by the state. Nothing is gained by state intervention in these private family matters. I am firmly Pro Choice, from both a practical and philosophical perspective. With the recent Supreme Court decision, taking away a woman's/family's right to make private medical decisions and leaving it to state legislatures to intervene, it has never been more important to have representative in Concord that will honor the rights of privacy and personal choice that women have held for decades. The Supreme Court took away the most fundamental right of women and families to make private choices, gave it to ever-changing state legislatures. If I'm elected I will work to give that right back. I will not only work to repeal this legislation, I'll work to codify a woman's choice as a right in NH, as it has been for the past 50 years. With respect to the 24 week threshold - this is a ban on something that is literally not done in our state. This law only exists to open the door to further restrictions by allowing the legislature to lower the threshold in increments - which has already been attempted. More could be said here, but I will also add that this is more than an abstract argument to me. My wife is an Ob/Gyn physician who has cared for women in our community for decades, and she has seen the many permutations of these difficult decisions play out in real, not theoretical, terms. Guarantee Right to abortion before 24 weeks: YES - This should be reinstated as a RIGHT, under individual privacy, as it has been for the past 50 years. First and foremost, a woman should have the right to make decisions about her health and reproduction. Unintended pregnancies, forced pregnancies, and unknown health risks are things that do happen. We can't ban abortions - only safe and medically appropriate ones. Our society is also strengthened by family planning and parents that are ready and able to care for their children to the degree they feel is appropriate. There is also seemingly little appetite for providing greater resources to support more children born to families that cannot support them (separate discussion). Nobody is forced to have an abortion - it is a choice and often a difficult one, as it should be. Any fully elective abortions near or at viability would normally be reviewed by medical ethics boards which would explore questions of the clinical and psycho-social situation surrounding a situation. Abortion should be rare, safe, and legal. Privacy and choice over one's body and family should be sacrosanct freedoms, not to be infringed by the state."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire ban discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in grades K-3?
"NO - I trust our educators to balance the needs of young students in addressing these topics, as they always have in instances when any questions of sexuality arise from children trying to understand the often complex world of adults around them. Bans like this serve no purpose other than to leave these children with no resources and likely greater fears and questions as they sense the inability of trusted adults to engage with them."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Do you support the state law that bans teaching certain concepts, such as the idea that people may be "inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously"?
"NO - This is among the worst pieces of legislation passed pertaining to state education. It diminishes the quality of education at the minimum, and - in reality - places an arbitrary threat over educators, forcing them to avoid some of the most important topics students should learn about. It is likely unconstitutional and has created a 'bounty system' for any parent that wishes to assert their preferences over the established curricula to call out individual teachers for scrutiny. It will erode our teaching workforce just as we are facing a crisis in teacher availability."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should NH add an income tax on earned income?
"NO - I do not support an income tax, but I also do not support our current property tax system that forces the elderly, others on low and/or fixed income, or those that live in rapidly changing communities, to leave their homes due to rising taxes. Tax relief should be targeted at those that need it. I would support expanding and re-targeting of tax relief programs such as the means-based protections on statewide property taxes for those at the lower-end and middle of the income scale, as well as similar programs such as those in place for veterans, the elderly, and the disabled. The basic structure for this is already in place in NH law, but it is crude, narrowly defined, and doesn't provide meaningful assistance at current levels or support to towns to offset the cost. As a result, the value of exemptions from the Low-Moderate relief program fell by 85% from 2003 to 2018. Expanding these types of options could provide key protections to those at risk of being forced from their homes for no fault of their own, without an income tax."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should NH add a broad-based sales tax?
"NO - Sales taxes are highly regressive, as those with the lowest income spend all of what they earn and would be effectively taxed on every dollar. They are also difficult to administer logistically, placing an additional burden on small and retail businesses."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire add a tax credit for businesses that contribute to student loan repayment for employees?
"DEPENDS - The burden of student loan debt is a large and growing problem that threatens to hamper the ability of our most capable young citizens to reach their full potential. Several industries are suffering from lack of workers, while our state loses talented graduates to other areas of the country unnecessarily. Education loan repayment programs have proven successful in attracting talented graduates into needed industries and communities in need, while providing a vehicle for students to access higher education. A business tax relief financed approach seems well suited to the situation in some industries. I have worked with the National Health Service Corps and Nurse Corps programs as part of my professional work for nearly 3 decades, both here in NH and across the country, These programs succeeds by targeting the aid to those individuals, professions, and communities where assistance is needed. A similar approach should be taken here. The recent proposal to target such assistance to a single industry - human organ manufacturing (SB 564) seems based on scant evidence of targeted need in a potentially highly profitable field, however I remain open to learning more on this."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire lower business taxes?
"NO - There are two taxes on business in NH, the Business Profits Tax and the Business Enterprise Tax. Most small and in-state businesses do not pay the Business Profits Tax, so recent cuts to this tax simply allow large out of state corporations, which will do business here regardless, to take these needed funds out of our state with no benefit to keeping jobs in NH. The Business Enterprise tax is more relevant as it is paid on the total scope of each NH businesses. Business is recovering after the challenges of the pandemic and, while issues remain, the tax rate is less than 1% on businesses over $250K in value, which is a reasonable contribution level, and provides a vehicle for state cuts to support business in the event of future downturns."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire add a tax on capital gains?
"I would consider a capital gains tax as a means of diversifying the state's revenue sources without an income tax. The capital gains tax rate was significantly reduced at the federal level in 2003 and these cuts were supposed to expire in 2008, but were not due to the Great Recession. Such a tax should protect those living off of invested savings from paying this tax with a minimum threshold. The wealth disparity in our country is at historic levels, with many having little to no capital savings to tax the gains on, while some have seen great growth in the value of invested funds while the economy suffers. It would be reasonable for those benefiting from these gains, not tied to jobs or labor, to contribute to the state through taxation when they 'cash in' these gains. This can be done without reducing the incentive to invest or causing capital flight from the state."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire increase the tax on cigarettes?
"As a career public health consultant, one might expect that this would be a simple 'yes', however the dynamics of tobacco taxation vs spending on treatment and prevention in NH have not lived up to the state's obligations in upholding public health priorities. Currently the state spends less than 1% of the CDC recommended target on treatment and prevention, while taking in tobacco related revenue well in excess of those recommendations from taxes, tobacco settlement, etc. The estimated cost of tobacco related illness in NH is nearly three times the total revenue the state takes in, so smoking is not a net positive financially for the state, beyond the human costs. While there is evidence that tobacco taxes do directly discourage youth initiation, for most smokers tobacco is an addiction and they will generally pay the increased costs of the higher taxation while programs to help them go underfunded. Smoking impacts lower income people disproportionately, making this even more problematic. I would support increased taxation only once state meets the recommended expenditure on prevention and cessation, and the remainder should go towards offsetting non-state costs form tobacco, such as higher insurance and health care costs."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire government do more to address climate change?
"YES - Reducing and mitigating carbon emissions is critically important. The impacts of inaction are becoming increasingly evident and time for effective action is running out. The technology to reduce reliance on carbon-based energy sources is becoming increasingly accessible and affordable, while technology to increase efficiency, such as electric vehicles and geothermal heating, are seeing a similar trend. I have personally moved to both of these technologies and seen nothing but positive results, particularly as energy prices have spiked. Both transitions were made more practical through government incentives, which lower the transition cost and make these technologies more attractive until widely adopted. Regional solutions, such as RGGI, are also important as they assure that no one area is bearing the burden while others continue outmoded practices. Carbon offsets are an effective approach to limiting our climate. Two recent reports have shown that RGGI has also protected children's health through reduced particulate emissions, while helping the environment and lowering family energy costs."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Do you support giving voters who register without ID on Election Day a ballot that only counts if they return identifying documents to the state before a deadline?
"NO - This is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist in our voting system, and introduces the potential to violate a voter's right to a secret ballot as that voter's choices would be associated with their individual identity on those provisional ballots."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire add a fee or mileage charge for electric vehicle owners to help pay for transportation and/or electric infrastructure?
"DEPENDS - I support the phasing in of road usage fees in the future. Our transportation system is in the midst of a major revolution as electric vehicles become practical and desirable as alternatives to internal combustion engines. I currently drive an all-electric vehicle and love it for many reasons including cost, capability, and environmental impact. The trend towards electric cars will undoubtedly continue, and that should be supported in every way. There were tax credits to purchase the vehicle and incentives from my electric company to install the charger. That said, I am aware that I am not contributing to the upkeep of our roads through the gas tax, which is untenable in the long term. In the short term the lack of gas taxes is yet another incentive to move towards electric vehicles and is justifiable on that basis. Going forward, I would support a 'road usage' fee, but not as an in-state tax on electric vehicles which is insensitive to the level of actual use. Instead I feel an expansion of our toll system, which impacts all vehicles, including out-of-state drivers and trucks that damage the roads, would be best. It is tied directly to use, and the EZ-pass system avoids cost and delays. It can also allow for individual vehicle tax exemptions as incentives that are limited by time and value."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire add restrictions to the governor's powers during a state of emergency?
"I don't see a strong case for restricting the powers and, in fact, I wish he had used them to a greater degree my mandating the wearing of masks in public places, as all other New England governors did, to protect our state's advantageous status in terms of COVID. I do think the question of oversight of spending on federal relief funds should be clarified to preserve the financial oversight role of the legislature."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should the state do more to encourage municipalities to remove zoning barriers to housing development?
"DEPENDS. Affordable housing is a huge challenge for our state. Housing prices in our region are very high and rental availability is very limited. This makes it difficult to attract and retain our retail and service workforce, and for young residents to live in our communities. This is unsustainable. There are a range of effective strategies to incentivize increased affordable housing and avoid gentrification. That said, our community has recently seen the unintended impacts of changes to zoning and building ordinances that threaten the rural character of our town while failing to produce more affordable options."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire extend the renewable portfolio standard past 2025, requiring public utilities to obtain more than 25% of electricity from renewable energy sources?
"YES - The move to renewable energy sources will help our state in the long run, and this is also increasingly practical and important today - both in terms of environment and cost. Incentivizing the rapid adoption of locally sourced and renewable energy sources is in our best interest. The speed and methods for implementing such incentives should be set based on the practical predictions of technological advancement. As with the net metering expansion question, standards for inclusion of increasing levels of renewable energy in the generation mix has been a positive on many levels for the state. A 2018 review of the Renewable Portfolio Standard noted that, 'RPS has increased use of renewable fuels and the development of renewable technologies, and has provided both economic and environmental benefits.' We must continue and accelerate that progress to protect environment and protect our energy supply from the foreign influences of fossil fuel markets that are causing current spikes in cost."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire guarantee the right to access abortion before 24 weeks?
"Repeal 24 week ban: YES - Any decisions that a woman and her family makes in this area are very personal and difficult. They should be made by the woman her health care providers, and those she wishes to involve...... not by the state. Nothing is gained by state intervention in these private family matters. I am firmly Pro Choice, from both a practical and philosophical perspective. With the recent Supreme Court decision, taking away a woman's/family's right to make private medical decisions and leaving it to state legislatures to intervene, it has never been more important to have representative in Concord that will honor the rights of privacy and personal choice that women have held for decades. The Supreme Court took away the most fundamental right of women and families to make private choices, gave it to ever-changing state legislatures. If I'm elected I will work to give that right back. I will not only work to repeal this legislation, I'll work to codify a woman's choice as a right in NH, as it has been for the past 50 years. With respect to the 24 week threshold - this is a ban on something that is literally not done in our state. This law only exists to open the door to further restrictions by allowing the legislature to lower the threshold in increments - which has already been attempted. More could be said here, but I will also add that this is more than an abstract argument to me. My wife is an Ob/Gyn physician who has cared for women in our community for decades, and she has seen the many permutations of these difficult decisions play out in real, not theoretical, terms. Guarantee Right to abortion before 24 weeks: YES - This should be reinstated as a RIGHT, under individual privacy, as it has been for the past 50 years. First and foremost, a woman should have the right to make decisions about her health and reproduction. Unintended pregnancies, forced pregnancies, and unknown health risks are things that do happen. We can't ban abortions - only safe and medically appropriate ones. Our society is also strengthened by family planning and parents that are ready and able to care for their children to the degree they feel is appropriate. There is also seemingly little appetite for providing greater resources to support more children born to families that cannot support them (separate discussion). Nobody is forced to have an abortion - it is a choice and often a difficult one, as it should be. Any fully elective abortions near or at viability would normally be reviewed by medical ethics boards which would explore questions of the clinical and psycho-social situation surrounding a situation. Abortion should be rare, safe, and legal. Privacy and choice over one's body and family should be sacrosanct freedoms, not to be infringed by the state."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire increase public access to reports of police misconduct?
"Yes, I am particularly focused on the 'Laurie List', where known issues of conduct or credibility have been identified with sufficient merit to make that officer an unreliable witness. In term of reporting all misconduct reports to the state, there is also merit in knowing that such reports have been made, as long as the final outcome is identified. As I've said, it is my experience that our law enforcement officers try very hard to uphold their duties in a difficult job, so openness about those that may not will further highlight the good work of the great majority."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Do you support the option of mail-in ballots for all voters, not just absentees?
"YES - The rules passed to allow COVID to be a valid reason for not voting in person was a positive and necessary step at the time. In general, this option should be available to anyone that wishes to vote remotely instead of in-person on election day. This could expand participation and assure that last minute issues do no thwart any person's ability to vote. The system is secure and valid."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should NH legalize the recreational use of marijuana?
"I do believe that citizens should be able to purchase and possess marijuana with appropriate age and product controls, but I am opposed to the FOR-PROFIT sale of marijuana or products containing THC, as there is no value in having organizations actively promoting initiation or increased use. I believe sales and distribution should be restricted to non-profit organizations with a mission to educate users and hold use to a minimum. Taxation should not be viewed as a new general revenue stream as this undermines the government's role in oversight and control of the product."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire legalize the recreational use of marijuana by allowing home-growing and private use without sales?
"Personal Use: YES - I have absolutely no issue with private recreational marijuana use, including home growing for non-commercial purposes. Criminalization of growing and possession has led to decades of unwarranted and wasteful use of law enforcement and judicial resources, and damaged many lives Private Retail: DEPENDS - I believe that citizens should be able to purchase and possess marijuana with appropriate age and product controls, but I am opposed to the FOR-PROFIT sale of marijuana or products containing THC, as there is no value in having organizations actively promoting initiation or increased use. The only difference between the marijuana industry and big tobacco is the federal ban on moving the proceeds though the banking system. This federal law will likely be repealed in the near future, and open the door to a new public health crisis. I believe sales and distribution can be accomplished by limiting sales to licensed non-profit organizations with a mission to educate users and hold use to a minimum. State Run Distribution: DEPENDS - The state should certainly legalize recreational use of marijuana, but this should not be viewed as a new general-revenue stream based on taxation or state-owned profit, as this undermines the government's role in oversight and control of the product. An excise tax, to recoup monitoring costs and fund any public health needs, may be appropriate. The state has not lived up to its role in similar areas, where funds collected through alcohol, tobacco, and legal gambling are not used - even minimally - to address the known and predictable consequences of these 'products', while the funds derived simply mask expenses rightfully borne more broadly. If the state is to be involved in the distribution of marijuana, it must be first to act in the public interest and not simply to avoid the need to raise revenue through other more traditional and broadly shared means."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire legalize the recreational use of marijuana by licensing growers and private retail locations?
"Personal Use: YES - I have absolutely no issue with private recreational marijuana use, including home growing for non-commercial purposes. Criminalization of growing and possession has led to decades of unwarranted and wasteful use of law enforcement and judicial resources, and damaged many lives Private Retail: DEPENDS - I believe that citizens should be able to purchase and possess marijuana with appropriate age and product controls, but I am opposed to the FOR-PROFIT sale of marijuana or products containing THC, as there is no value in having organizations actively promoting initiation or increased use. The only difference between the marijuana industry and big tobacco is the federal ban on moving the proceeds though the banking system. This federal law will likely be repealed in the near future, and open the door to a new public health crisis. I believe sales and distribution can be accomplished by limiting sales to licensed non-profit organizations with a mission to educate users and hold use to a minimum. State Run Distribution: DEPENDS - The state should certainly legalize recreational use of marijuana, but this should not be viewed as a new general-revenue stream based on taxation or state-owned profit, as this undermines the government's role in oversight and control of the product. An excise tax, to recoup monitoring costs and fund any public health needs, may be appropriate. The state has not lived up to its role in similar areas, where funds collected through alcohol, tobacco, and legal gambling are not used - even minimally - to address the known and predictable consequences of these 'products', while the funds derived simply mask expenses rightfully borne more broadly. If the state is to be involved in the distribution of marijuana, it must be first to act in the public interest and not simply to avoid the need to raise revenue through other more traditional and broadly shared means."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire legalize the recreational use of marijuana by establishing state-run cannabis stores?
"Personal Use: YES - I have absolutely no issue with private recreational marijuana use, including home growing for non-commercial purposes. Criminalization of growing and possession has led to decades of unwarranted and wasteful use of law enforcement and judicial resources, and damaged many lives Private Retail: DEPENDS - I believe that citizens should be able to purchase and possess marijuana with appropriate age and product controls, but I am opposed to the FOR-PROFIT sale of marijuana or products containing THC, as there is no value in having organizations actively promoting initiation or increased use. The only difference between the marijuana industry and big tobacco is the federal ban on moving the proceeds though the banking system. This federal law will likely be repealed in the near future, and open the door to a new public health crisis. I believe sales and distribution can be accomplished by limiting sales to licensed non-profit organizations with a mission to educate users and hold use to a minimum. State Run Distribution: DEPENDS - The state should certainly legalize recreational use of marijuana, but this should not be viewed as a new general-revenue stream based on taxation or state-owned profit, as this undermines the government's role in oversight and control of the product. An excise tax, to recoup monitoring costs and fund any public health needs, may be appropriate. The state has not lived up to its role in similar areas, where funds collected through alcohol, tobacco, and legal gambling are not used - even minimally - to address the known and predictable consequences of these 'products', while the funds derived simply mask expenses rightfully borne more broadly. If the state is to be involved in the distribution of marijuana, it must be first to act in the public interest and not simply to avoid the need to raise revenue through other more traditional and broadly shared means."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Was New Hampshire right to continue expanded Medicaid eligibility, using the traditional Medicaid system of managed care instead of private insurance?
"There are 2 questions here. Continued Medicaid expansion was of primary importance for assuring access to care for our most vulnerable citizens. Turning away $400M per year in federal funds at a 90:10 match with no reduction in federal taxes for NH residents should be considered legislative malpractice. The move towards private insurance was largely symbolic and political from the outset... it was always destined to be more costly and administratively difficult than traditional Medicaid."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire raise the minimum wage?
"YES - NH has no state minimum wage - relying on the federal minimum only, placing it among the states with the lowest minimum wages in the country. We are one of the 'wealthier' states overall, and NH has a relatively high cost of living compared to other parts of the country. Recent price increases in some key sectors has only further reduced the value of our fixed minimum wage with no means to adjust it to match. Wages are rising but not at a pace to match costs. Other states in New England have minimum wages more than 50% higher than ours. Establishing a phased in increase to the minimum wage in the state is needed, and can be accomplished without impacting the job market."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should NH do more to enforce federal immigration laws?
"It is not our state's role to enforce federal immigration laws and our current federal environment is particularly at odds with NH values. We should pursue immigration reform and not draw our states and local communities into the enforcement of the federal obligations."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire increase the size of solar panel installations that may participate in net energy metering?
"Yes, I believe the transformation of our energy infrastructure to clean, carbon neutral, and locally produced sources should be supported in any way possible ? both for the environment and to foster the jobs and innovation that leading in this area bring to our economy. Limits on the expansion of solar energy are shortsighted and will hurt our state in the long run."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire increase subsidies and tax credits for business investment?
"This depends on the situation. I support limited government subsidies/credits for business investments that might not otherwise be in the short term financial interest of the organization, but which serves a societal goal (hiring/training veterans lacking skills, move to more efficient/clean energy production, etc). Most investments should yield benefits that are their own incentives, without state support. The key is that it is an 'investment'. I was opposed to the cut in the Business Profits Tax, for example, because it simply rewards large corporations for taking $ out of the state."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire increase the base amount of per-pupil funding it provides to local school districts?
"Yes, the state's definition of 'adequacy' ($3700 per student) falls incredibly far below any realistic expectation of the cost of providing an adequate education (several times that amount), which has been affirmed as a state constitutional requirement in NH by multiple Supreme Court cases. Local property taxes must make up the difference. Cuts to aid to towns from the state, billed as tax cuts, simply pushed the costs to the towns, which have few ways to diversify revenue sources, which must be spread across the property valuation. The result is massive disparities in education, with towns having lower property valuations, such as ones in my district, bearing a greater burden. This pits long-time residents living on fixed incomes and afraid of being driven out of their homes against young families seeking a good education for their children. A healthy community needs both, and nobody will teach a child more than the town's 'old timers'! The restoration of stabilization grants in the last legislative session were a start but more is needed."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should the state permanently increase how much tax revenue it shares with towns and cities every year, beyond public school funding?
"YES - Decreases in revenue sharing from the state to the towns has been a key reason for rising local property taxes over the past decade or more. When the state reduces revenue sharing to towns, the towns have few options but to raise property taxes or dramatically cut services. The state has many options by which it can generate revenue to offset the burden borne by local taxpayers. The revenue sharing should not be left to the whims of each legislature, leaving towns unable to plan ahead. The commitment should be made by the state and funded as needed, as had been the case for municipal retirement plans in the past, for example."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Do you support the gradual phase-out of the Interests and Dividends tax?
"NO - We are living in a time of historic wealth disparity in which earnings from hard work is taxed (federally) at a much higher rate than income from invested wealth, which far exceeds other income for some. There is no reason to repeal or reduce the tax on interest and dividends at this time, however I do feel that the excluded income threshold ($2400 per individual) is likely too low. At this level, the tax may be burdening those that are living on this income alone (in spite of an additional elderly exemption), and causing unnecessary filings for those with typical investments."
Other| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Is police brutality an issue in NH?
"I support the use of body and dash cameras as a means of monitoring and reviewing police interactions. We should be mindful of how law enforcement officials interact with the public as an overall principal, and police brutality is a real issue. Every incident of it hurts the reputation of the vast majority of officers that seek to limit violence, even in dangerous and tense situations. We have seen less overt police violence in our state, and I believe the police in my community and state do an excellent job overall."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Do you support Gov. Sununu's proposal to allow employers and employees to opt-in to a private, paid family and medical leave insurance plan, based on a pool of state employees, excluding coverage for personal illness?
"No. See my statement above about the statewide option."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Do you support the state’s current system of public school funding, with each district’s total funding primarily dependent on local property tax revenue?
"NO - The flaws in the current education funding system are more than fully documented, and have been the subject of multiple state Supreme Court cases which have refuted as not just flawed, but unconstitutional. Yet another suit was filed on June 28, 2022, as the state has failed to address the underlying problems. The non-partisan NH School Funding Fairness Project has done a great deal to outline the issues and potential solutions. Even the recent $100M one-time reduction of the statewide property tax, touted by republicans, was so poorly targeted that it made the underlying problems worse, targeting aid to property rich communities and leaving many communities in need with less state aid than they had before, per the non-partisan InDepthNH's August 2022 article, 'State's Education Funding System Is a Mess'."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire continue to participate in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which requires utilities to purchase allowances for every ton of carbon they emit?
"Yes, reducing and mitigating carbon emissions is critically important. Regional solutions assure that no one area is bearing the burden while others continue outmoded practices. Carbon offsets are an effective approach to limiting our climate impact and RGGI was an effective initiative. Two recent reports have shown that RGGI has also protected children's health through reduced particulate emissions, while helping the environment and lowering family energy costs."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should New Hampshire maintain the renewable portfolio standard, which requires public utilities in New Hampshire to obtain a certain percentage of electricity from renewable energy sources (25% by 2025)?
"The move to renewable energy sources will help our state in the long run - both in terms of environment and cost, so incentivizing the rapid adoption of locally sourced and renewable energy sources is in our best interest. The speed and methods for implementing such incentives should be set based on the practical predictions of technological advancement."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should New Hampshire repeal the ban on abortion after 24 weeks gestation?
"Repeal 24 week ban: YES - Any decisions that a woman and her family makes in this area are very personal and difficult. They should be made by the woman her health care providers, and those she wishes to involve...... not by the state. Nothing is gained by state intervention in these private family matters. I am firmly Pro Choice, from both a practical and philosophical perspective. With the recent Supreme Court decision, taking away a woman's/family's right to make private medical decisions and leaving it to state legislatures to intervene, it has never been more important to have representative in Concord that will honor the rights of privacy and personal choice that women have held for decades. The Supreme Court took away the most fundamental right of women and families to make private choices, gave it to ever-changing state legislatures. If I'm elected I will work to give that right back. I will not only work to repeal this legislation, I'll work to codify a woman's choice as a right in NH, as it has been for the past 50 years. With respect to the 24 week threshold - this is a ban on something that is literally not done in our state. This law only exists to open the door to further restrictions by allowing the legislature to lower the threshold in increments - which has already been attempted. More could be said here, but I will also add that this is more than an abstract argument to me. My wife is an Ob/Gyn physician who has cared for women in our community for decades, and she has seen the many permutations of these difficult decisions play out in real, not theoretical, terms. Guarantee Right to abortion before 24 weeks: YES - This should be reinstated as a RIGHT, under individual privacy, as it has been for the past 50 years. First and foremost, a woman should have the right to make decisions about her health and reproduction. Unintended pregnancies, forced pregnancies, and unknown health risks are things that do happen. We can't ban abortions - only safe and medically appropriate ones. Our society is also strengthened by family planning and parents that are ready and able to care for their children to the degree they feel is appropriate. There is also seemingly little appetite for providing greater resources to support more children born to families that cannot support them (separate discussion). Nobody is forced to have an abortion - it is a choice and often a difficult one, as it should be. Any fully elective abortions near or at viability would normally be reviewed by medical ethics boards which would explore questions of the clinical and psycho-social situation surrounding a situation. Abortion should be rare, safe, and legal. Privacy and choice over one's body and family should be sacrosanct freedoms, not to be infringed by the state."
Undecided| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire create a road usage fee?
"I support the phasing in of road usage fees in the future. Our transportation system is in the midst of a major revolution as electric vehicles become viable and desirable alternatives to internal combustion engines. I currently drive an all-electric vehicle and love it for many reasons including cost, capability, and environmental impact. The trend towards electric cars will undoubtedly continue and that should be supported. There were tax credits to purchase the vehicle and incentives from my electric company to install the charger. That said, I am aware that I'm not contributing to the upkeep of our roads through gas tax, which is untenable in the long term. In the short term the lack of gas taxes is yet another incentive to move towards electric vehicles and is justifiable on that basis. Going forward, I would support a 'road usage' fee, but not as an in-state tax on electric vehicles. Instead I feel an expansion of our toll system, which impacts all vehicles, including out-of-state drivers and trucks that damage the roads, would be best. It's tied directly to use and the EZ-pass system avoids cost and delays."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should New Hampshire government do more to increase the supply of affordable housing?
"Housing prices in our region are very high and rental availability is very limited. This makes it difficult to attract and retain our retail and service workforce, and young residents to our communities. There are a range of effective strategies to incentivize increased affordable housing and avoid gentrification."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should NH continue to administer statewide standards-based student assessments?
"There is no perfect process to monitor educational outcomes, but not monitoring them is irresponsible. The process should be minimally intrusive and the content of the tests should reflect the diverse range of knowledge and experience expected."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire create a statewide family and medical leave program, paid for with a percentage of employee wages, with no opt-out?
"Yes, both parties proposed a version of paid family and medical leave during the last session, so there is broad agreement that we need such a program fostered by the state. COVID has shown that even more clearly. With that seemingly settled, the question is how best to structure and pay for the program - which is truly a form of insurance that you own personally when you pay in (not a government program covering others who don't pay, as it's often portrayed). From my 30 years of health policy consulting it is clear that bigger more inclusive risk pools are more stable and less costly overall for many reasons. You can see the convolutions the Sununu/Bradley plan go through trying to recreate that stability in the smaller voluntary approach, with taxes on premiums, rebates on premiums paid, and even an attempt to get VT to join in. Also, voluntary insurance tends to fail because people can game when they participate and those that have truly unexpected events are left out, or pay the price that process (adverse selection). To rebuff one of the key talking points we hear, this is NOT an income tax.... it's tied to your income because the benefit you get is proportional to your income. It doesn't fund any expansion of other government programs as many fear a true 'income tax' (which I don't support, see separate response) will."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2022
Should NH pass stricter gun control laws?
"YES - I do support reasonable changes to our gun control laws. We will not solve all issues with gun violence but we can do much better without impinging on anyone's rights. I believe the second amendment does provide for the individual right to own firearms, and as a practical matter that will always be the case as well. The second amendment does, however, start with the phrase, 'A well regulated militia...' so I don't feel it precludes sensible regulations, which should not interfere with a responsible individual's gun ownership, but which would prevent some of the issues stemming from those that should not have had access to a weapon for several reasons. I view it similarly to how cars and driving are regulated in terms of registration and licensing, but also to include universal background checks. Even the first amendment has limits. Classically, you can't shout 'Fire' in a crowded theater.... because it would endanger public safety, and the same is true for this right. I also believe - as affirmed by the Supreme Court in the Heller ruling - that the second amendment is '...not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever.' In particular, I would like to assure that our police and military are always the best armed members of our society, and that there is a clear line between what is civilian vs not. Our communities have seen firearm tragedies directly, including the loss of a good man, officer, and father of my son's friend, which I believe everyone should want to find ways to prevent. I have been disappointed to see the adoption of laws weakening firearm regulations recently, including the repeal of the concealed carry permit and the adoption of 'stand your ground' legislation eliminating the requirement to diffuse potentially deadly conflicts. This past session saw a raft of similar bills introduced, including passage of a law allowing brandishing of a weapon without consequence. None of these is a responsible reaction to the rising issue of gun violence."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire provide student loan debt repayment programs for workers in industries with labor shortages?
"Student debt repayment incentives can be a powerful tool to address two issues simultaneously ? the need to attract workers to areas where workforce is lacking, and the need to reduce the debt burden that holds some back from seeking training/education or limits what jobs they can take. I have worked for decades to help NH and other states participate in the National Health Service Corps, a federal program which pays off medical education debt in return for service in an area lacking providers. The state has found this valuable enough to make its own investment in a related program. I have also worked with the program at the national level, to help improve the process of targeting that support to the areas of greatest need. As a result of many policies, mostly external to our NH, we have several other industries where skilled labor has been lacking and where such incentives could help our state compete for these resources nationally."
For| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire add tax incentives for affordable housing development?
"Yes. Housing prices in our region are very high and rental availability is very limited. This makes it difficult to attract and retain our retail and service workforce, and young residents to our communities. There are a range of effective strategies to incentivize increased affordable housing and avoid gentrification."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2020
Should New Hampshire allocate tax revenues for private and home schooling costs?
"NO. This change weakens and destabilizes public education in several key ways, while increasing cost. It would divert public funds from our local school district, leaving taxpayers to pay more of the fixed school infrastructure costs already in place and leaving those without the ability to take advantage of these options with little choice and less resources. It would make the process of predicting annual enrollment even harder, leading to greater variability is cost, staffing, and class size management. In the latest attempt to pass this (SB 193 from 2018) the funds would have been administered by any number of private charitable 'scholarship' organizations, making meaningful oversight expensive and difficult, and these organizations would have been the only body to review the testing and progress of the students under their control."
Against| Read My Position
Citizens Count Issue Survey, 2018
Should NH impose strict residency requirements on registering to vote?
"I was very disappointed in Gov. Sununu's signing of HB 1264 after his initial, and correct, statement that this was a terrible bill that he promised to veto. It adds unnecessary cost and burden to the process of voting, which should be encouraged more than ever - especially for the college students we should hope to keep in our state. It solves a non-existent problem with a heavy handed fix. Other states' residency requirements do not impose these burdens, so this is not just NH catching up."
Voting Record
SB 263 (2023)
Permanently reauthorizes the New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program, commonly known as expanded Medicaid. Previous law ended the program on December 31, 2023. This bill also reestablishes and revises the commission to evaluate the New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program, commonly known as expanded Medicaid.
HB 10 (2023)
Establishes a parental bill of rights. Some of the parental rights in this bill include:
"The right to direct the education and care of his or her minor child"
"The right to be physically present at any health care facility ... at which their minor child is receiving hospital care"
"The right to consent in writing before a biometric scan of his or her minor child is made, shared, or stored"
HB 367 (2023)
Increases the maximum household income limit for participation in the Education Freedom Account program, from 300% to 500% of the federal poverty guidelines. The Education Freedom Account program allows families to spend the state's per-pupil share of education funding on private or home school expenses.
The House amended the bill to only increase the income limit to 350% of the federal poverty guidelines.
SB 272 (2023)
Establishes a parental bill of rights in education. Some of the parental rights in this bill include:
"The right to access and review all medical records of a child maintained by a school or school personnel"
"The right to inquire of the school or school personnel and to be truthfully and completely informed if the child is being identified or referred to by school district staff, as being of a gender other than that of which the child was identified or referred when enrolled"
HB 2 (2023)
State budget bill (part 2). The governor presented his proposal for the next state budget February 14. The House and Senate both made changes to that proposal. Click here to read a summary of the 2023 budget process.
HB 208 (2023)
Establishes greenhouse gas emission reduction goals for the state, to net zero by 2050. This bill also requires the Department of Environmental Services to develop a climate action plan by July 1, 2024, that includes evaluation of best available information, considers inclusion of strategies, programs and compliance mechanisms with measurable goals and targets, considers opportunities to encourage investment in low/moderate income, rural and minority communities, makes recommendations on retraining and apprenticeship opportunities, and coordinates with other state agencies.
HB 106 (2023)
Establishes a procedure for issuing "extreme risk protection orders" to protect against persons who pose an immediate risk of harm to themselves or others. An extreme risk protection order would restrict a person's access to firearms, and is also known as a "red flag law."
HB 59 (2023)
Requires commercial sales and transfers of firearms to take place through licensed dealers. Those dealers are required to perform background checks.
HB 557 (2023)
Removes the authority of the Department of Health and Human Services to require vaccinations beyond those in state law. This bill specifically notes that the requirements for chickenpox, Hepatitis B, and Hib vaccinations will expire in 2026.
HB 639 (2023)
Legalizes marijuana for adults over age twenty-one. The bill allows limited home-growing of marijuana. A new Cannabis Commission would oversee licensing and regulations related to the manufacture, testing, and sale of legal marijuana. Cannabis sales would be taxed under the Meals and Rooms tax system. Alternative Treatment Centers, which currently serve the state's medical marijuana patients, would be allowed to apply for a "dual use certificate" that allows them to participate in recreational marijuana business. Towns could limit marijuana businesses.
HB 523 (2023)
Increases the maximum electric generating capacity to participate in net energy metering, from one to five megawatts. This bill also modifies the transition of tariffs applicable to some customer-generators.
HB 57 (2023)
Gradually raises the minimum wage to $15 per hour over the next three years, with future adjustments based on the consumer price index. This bill also raises the tipped minimum wage from 45% to 50% of the regular minimum wage. Lastly, this bill allows a minimum wage of $8 per hour for youth under age 18 for the first six months of employment.
HB 224 (2023)
Repeals the civil and criminal penalties for health care providers who violate the state's ban on abortion after 24 weeks.
HB 624 (2023)
Requires state and local law enforcement to notify the public before an immigration checkpoint.
HB 567 (2023)
Requires at least 30 days written notice for a rent increase. Large, multi-unit rental owners must provide at least 60 days notice. If the rent increase is over 15%, large multi-unit landlords must provide at least 6 months notice.
